Skip to content

Conversation

@Knerio
Copy link
Member

@Knerio Knerio commented Aug 25, 2024

close #3

@Knerio Knerio added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 25, 2024
@Knerio Knerio requested a review from Taucher2003 August 25, 2024 12:42
@Knerio Knerio self-assigned this Aug 25, 2024
@Knerio Knerio linked an issue Aug 25, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@Knerio Knerio changed the title add a check to also allow hashes instead of lambda blocks add a check to also allow hashes instead of only lambda blocks Aug 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Taucher2003 Taucher2003 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from some readme adjustments, looks good

Knerio and others added 3 commits August 25, 2024 15:24
Co-authored-by: Niklas van Schrick <mc.taucher2003@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Niklas van Schrick <mc.taucher2003@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Niklas van Schrick <mc.taucher2003@gmail.com>
@Knerio Knerio merged commit 37dc109 into main Aug 25, 2024
@Knerio Knerio deleted the 3-support-objects-too-instead-of-only-lamda-functions branch August 25, 2024 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support objects too, instead of only lamda functions

3 participants